Wednesday, June 30, 2010

"racebending"

a quick re-post from facebook, on why "Avatar: The Last Airbender" is pushing race representations in a very very problematic way:

Here is a video that speaks for itself: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBda7b9tRdk please watch!

on the people of color in the cast:
yes they exist, but Dev Patel, Cliff Curtis, and Summer Bishil (our resident people of color) are all cast as Fire Nation characters = villains. packing the villain train full of brown people is nothing to celebrate. not to mention that the original zuko was white ( http://www.thepostgameshow.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/mccartney-zuko.jpg ) but was recast by a brown man. paramount is not oblivious.

on the characters being 'race ambiguous' in the cartoon:
A) false. katara and sokka are entirely based on inuits. here's a pic: http://pics.livejournal.com/aang_aint_white/pic/00003ddq
on top of that, while their names aren't inuit, they're not racially ambiguous-- in fact they're most likely inspired by japanese names. only that "sokka" seems like a whitened spelling of "saka."
B) false for aang as well. aang is a chinese name, although the spelling is also slightly whitened from "ang" (don't know why that had to be whitened, nobody seems to have trouble pronouncing "Ang Lee," the Taiwanese American director). aang's character as well as his trajectory throughout the entire series is based upon the shaolin monks. beginning young, and setting off on a spiritual buddhist journey that involves becoming well trained in chinese martial arts. on top of that, here's what a shaolin monk looks like: http://web.tiscali.it/giovaneforesta/Grafica/shaolin%20monk.jpg nearly identical to aang's outfit.

on other asian representations in the cartoon:
1) WRITING: only mandarin/chinese characters are used throughout the entire cartoon-- you can thank tattoo artists for making them look like exotic symbols, but yes, characters are written language as much as letters or words are in english. the series is headlined with chinese. and each episode begins with chinese characters (NOT japanese kanji) that spell out the four elements. every scroll, every document that is read throughout the series is spoken in english but written in chinese. which is kinda cool of the animators, rather than just scribbling! in fact, just for kicks haha, here is a website that tells you how to practice your chinese calligraphy just by watching avatar: http://hubpages.com/hub/Learning-Traditional-Chinese-Characters-through-the-Television-Series-AVATAR

2) BUILDINGS: are all inspired by dinstinctly asian/inuit/pacific islander cultures. a blog i read summed it up well:
"There are no equivalents to African or European cultures in the Avatar world. There are no medieval French castles. There are no Egyptian temples. There are no Viking long houses. There are no Malian mosques." so really, the whole "avatar is all about global diversity" thing is out the window. the youtube video above does a good job of comparing the architecture specifically. not to mention that last city in the earth kingdom (ba sing se?) is entirely based on the forbidden city in beijing, china.
here is a picture of ba sing se in the cartoon: http://dkamayo.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/bss_palace_001.jpg
here is a picture of the forbidden city: http://home.pacbell.net/eevans2/China/P1010329%20Forbidden%20City.JPG
here are pictures of the forbidden city watchtowers: http://www.vagabondjourney.com/2008-1/08-2174-forbidden-city-beijing.jpg
even the walkways look almost entirely the same:
http://www.chinatravelcompass.com/beijing/img/attractions/forbidden_city/photo/1/forbidden_city_32.JPG
ALSO, the 'lion turtle' that's a recurring theme in avatar (see here: http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090620212153/avatar/images/7/74/Lion_Turtle_statue_pilot.png ) is a spitting image of chinese guardian lions (see here: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2e/ImperialMotherLionGuard.jpg/600px-ImperialMotherLionGuard.jpg ).

....so yes, Avatar is heavily BASED (and not just inspired) on asian & inuit culture. regardless of what race the writers of the show were, or where the show was aired, avatar is still a representation of asian culture. it simply does not make sense to cast white actors in a movie representative of asian culture, especially since asian actors are already restricted to the few roles that they can play. jet li, jackie chan, chow yun fat, etc. are successful for a reason. not because they're asian and charismatic, but because they're asian and know very well how to market themselves to fit asian stereotypes (read: learn kunfu). this is not 'overanalyzing it'. this is contributing to a very, very long history of blackface/yellowface and in making people of color INVISIBLE even when they're most directly represented.

Monday, May 31, 2010

no patience for anti-choicers

P.S.: saying "pro-life" is basically falling into a big ol' trap. Because..
A) it makes us pro-choicers also "anti-life" by implication,
and B) it would be presupposing that fetuses are independent entities (if you have any doubts about this, refer to pic below), and lead to that whole there's-no-way-to-get-out-of-this-because-you've-already-made-some-hazardous-assumptions "abortion is murder" argument...

Let's not go there, to that dark place where the crazies live.
But the point of the post was to share some internet awesomeness:


I can't seem to find the original source, though! My bad.

Monday, May 24, 2010

Is the fashion industry our's?

A while ago, this photo made it's way over to Reddit.



Surprise surprise, the predominantly male Reddit community tore these non-makeup-wearing women apart. Feel free to read some of the comments if you have the heart to. It's your garden variety degradation of women, which begins with some sort of insult (e.g. "
...lips that look like they got stuck in a vacuum cleaner hose until they bled"), something about which ones are fuckable, and then concluding with more insult. The gentlest comment will probably forgo the fuckability part and just go with two solid insults in a row. Anyway, here is a much better article from Jezebel on why these men feel entitled to ridicule these supermodels (P.S. these are all the highest paid supermodels in the world).

The main point the writer stresses is that the fashion industry is one that 'belongs' to women. An industry that is predominantly female, doesn't rely on men's critiques, and certainly doesn't serve men's tastes. I never thought of it that way. Sure, the fashion industry has it's own messed up standards of thinness (cue Karl Lagerfeld), but I can't disagree that it is relatively dry of the mainstream male's gaze. We always talk about this 'gaze' in class.. Think about it. Almost everywhere you look, the world is framed in the eyes/opinions of a man. It's hard to see only because we've gotten so used to it, but this is a pretty damn good explanation of why women are only visible in public in the most stereotypical ways. Even with the so-called Ugly Betties of television (e.g. Ugly Betty herself, or the nerdy girl from Community, or even that other nerdy girl from Glee), what you're really seeing is a smokin' hot Maxim girl wearing glasses, braces, and a cardigan. Even when the character is somewhat quirky, television shows still feel the need to find a very stereotypically beautiful actress to "dumb down" her hotness for the role.

Click "read more" for the actresses' pictures side by side.

And don't even start with the whole, "Well, it's the magic of makeup and lighting." Sure, there is a lot of magic going on, but I bet you could find a huge population of women who won't look like that even with a team of professionals. The point is that the "male gaze" stops you from seeing possibilities outside of those that are created by the image of a big-boobed, sultry-eyed babe. EVEN when that image dresses itself up as Ugly Betty. P.S.: Here is an awesome article about pretending that the hot women of television aren't hot. The author calls it the "Liz Lemon" effect, haha.

This would also help to debunk the myth that having women on a production/casting/whatever team intervenes in the male gaze. The gaze is soooooooo ingrained in all of us that it's hard to be successful without surrendering to it. Even if you are ideologically against the male gaze, have fun trying to make it big in Hollywood. It's possible, thank god, but it will be a pain in the ass.

SOOOOOOOOOO. My question stands. Is the fashion industry reproducing a male gaze? Is it reproducing some mutated version of it? Or is it an exclusively "our's"? I still don't know if I can answer this one.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

walk like a virgin, talk like a whore

or walk like a whore, talk like a virgin? I'm not sure. I don't think that title really worked out here but it was worth a shot. Annnyyywayyy..

So I am super frustrated with these "It's okay not to have sex" ads.

Exhibit A

Okay let's stick with Exhibit A for now, because there's just too much to say about this one. Don't be deceived by the wording... but think about what it's actually reinforcing. The real work, in any advertisement, is in reading what is not OBVIOUSLY stated; in finding the hidden "therefore..." to it. So while this campaign may seem to be innocently telling girls "sexy ≠ having sex," I can't help to think what happens to everyone else who falls somewhere outside of that alignment: "already having sex = ?", or "not sexy = ?".. or both, "not sexy & having sex = ?".
Sooooooooo.
Have you heard about the virgin-whore expectation? If so, move along, if not keep reading. Firstly, girls nowadays grow up with the knowledge that it's much, much, much easier to get what you want when you're beautiful/sexy. Before anyone brings up how difficult their sorry lives are because "nobody takes them seriously as an attractive woman," let's just say this: without your beauty, you would be down right invisible. Being 'taken seriously' is part 2 to being noticed, so let's agree on that first. Secondly, girls are also told just how important virginity is to (A) their self-worth, and (B) the worth that the rest of the world attributes to them. Beginning with creeptastic purity balls, and constantly policed with slut-shaming from parents, friends, and the-general-rest-of-the-world. I'll go into slut-shaming more another day, but just keep in mind the consequences for a young girl or woman who has sex. All hell breaks loose. So let's piece this together: (1) must be sexy at all times to even get my foot in the door, (2) must be virginal. What we get is the virgin-whore complex. This is something that starts young and gets told to women from all different kinds of places--keep in mind that it's also not always with bad intentions, either. When I say that slut-shaming comes from parents, for example, it's not to say that parents are intentionally trying to make their daughters feel like shit. It's just showing you how deep this idea runs.


MOVING ON... can you see now, why I have a problem with the campaign? While abstinence is not a bad thing, this isn't the way to 'promote' it. This is only reinforcing the age-old idea that women, you are worthless without your virginity, and invisible with your sexiness. So here's an impossible tight-rope to walk. Oh yeah, and if you happen to fall off of it, you're a giant slut for it.

I have to take a break from this frustration, but will add more soon!
In the meantime, here is an awesome-on-top-of-awesome article by Jessica Valenti on why we really, really need to throw out the campaign for virginity.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

creepy quotes 'R' us

"You know what, I am never going to quit speaking on behalf of the unborn." 

Randy Neugebauer (R - TX), on his anti-choice efforts to represent the humanoid-looking cluster of cells growing inside women's bodies. And yes, this is also the guy who called Bart Stupak a baby-killer on the House floor (I still don't get it... anyone?).

the book club

This is where books with good intentions go wrong.
From Margaret McGuire's The Quotable Douchebag...
Keep in mind, though, that this book is condemning (and not endorsing) these quotes. Also keep in mind that I had to specify that (I'll bring it up later in Problem #3).


Problem #1: The "Ignore Him, He's Just Stupid" Take
I know, right? We can thank Clayton Williams, the Republican candidate for governor of Texas in 1990, for this gem. There's not much I can say about the quote itself, except for the fact that twenty years later, we still hear this kind of hopeless stupidity from people in positions of authority that really can't afford it (actually, we're the ones who can't afford it). The danger here is the Just Another argument: it's just another racist, it's just another misogynist, or it's just another crazy and misinformed person. That may be true on an individual scale, but these ideas are reflective of the cultural climate that we live in, and the widespread availability of misogyny. These attitudes towards rape weren't plucked out of thin air, but were readily available and purchased by Williams from the cues that we drop and the equations that we write about women. Williams is responsible for the articulation, but the rest of us are neck-deep in a society that produces and endorses the blueprints of his logic.

(Continued with problem #2 and #3...)

Sunday, February 21, 2010

language matters

A right-on post about language, and why it's a big deal.
Something that is so often ignored, so often discredited.
Hint hint, word work..

On calling female athletes 'girls', and why we shouldn't shrug this off as just-plain-vanilla semantics:
"The language of any culture not only reflects the ideological biases that characterize it; it replicates and reinforces them.  And while the attempt to oppose this particular phenomenon of calling, in all spheres of society, adult women "girls"... seems now to be regarded as an irrelevant or passé "old wave" concern, reality... reveals it to be more urgent than ever.  What we need be attuned to is the fact that the way we speak is, to some extent, inextricable from the way we act, both as individuals and as a society.  That men - and women - persist in calling adult females "girls," cannot, legitimately, be decoupled from such disturbing cultural trends as the media sexualization of increasingly younger girls, or from the rise of eternal prepubescence (slim, hairless) as the expected standard of adult women's bodies, nor, ultimately, even from such horrors as honor killings and aerobics room shooting sprees."